Overall Comments
Many
thanks for submitting this third assignment Michael, which contained some
really strong monochrome images.
Key
issues mentioned in my last report are as follows:
- Try
to be a little more reflective in terms of the contextual element of the
assignment, rather than descriptive.
- Look
at the work of Harry Callaghan / Tom Hunter / Nicky Bird.
- Consider
what Barthes says in relation to Studium & Punctum.
- Always
try to consider composition as a way of personal expression within an
image.
- Further
consider the monochrome versus colour debate.
- Try
to make reference to which practitioners are informing your own practice
within the contextual element of the submission.
I can see from your submission that
you are responding very positively to much of the feedback suggestions
provided, which is excellent. I enjoyed
reading the first written section of the submission which was making all the
right noises as far as I am concerned …. much less about ‘how’ and much more
about ‘why’.
Feedback on
assignment
There was an element of the written
component that actually touches on the next assignment (Real or Fake) which was
interesting to see. (Also consider the
work of Robert Capa / Dorethea Lange etc.)
These ten images worked really well
for me and I thought as a themed body of work they achieved the objective you
set out with, in terms of the visual exploration of your local area. It is often a myth really to think that the
best photostory’s happen in exotic places …. You will find that once you scrape
the surface locally, interesting things begin to be revealed.
I think you should have a real
confidence in the photographic work you are producing, which in my opinion is
visually quite challenging and tends to avoid the more obvious and
stereotypical. This was a body of work that
gripped my attention from the outset, with various compositional elements and
decisions adding visual intrigue to the work.
From a technical perspective, there wasn’t anything I could really
comment upon that bothered me, or got in my way of viewing the work. The first shot for instance didn’t just
present an untidy back yard … there were all kinds of subtle framing within
framing going on here. IE: The pegs
framed by the windows, the gate way framing the yard, the chaotic angles of the
pipes etc etc … this was well observed
in my opinion …. many would have just walked straight past !
Each shot had something interesting
hidden within it, such as the bricked up door or the weeping wall with the
vent. The shots felt well balanced to
me, especially the final shot of the back alley way. I liked the way this shot
had been constructed; with just enough horizontal road in the foreground to
lead you into the vertical road in the background … I liked the position of the
circular grid and the telegraph pole etc.
The punctum for me is that remaining embedded white lintel in the shot
of the wall with drainpipe. This was a
simple shot but very effective …. highlighting an opening which is no longer
required, but which has served as an access point to the property for decades
in the past. Conduct some research into the term ‘Genus Loci’ and its application
within photographic practice, I think you might find this of interest to your
work.
Learning
Logs/Critical essays
The blog is working very well for you
and is being updated – which is great to
see. You have a number of different
sections which can lead the viewer straight to what they are looking for …
which will make things easier for the assessor in terms of navigation.
Suggested reading/viewing
Evans,
W.2013. American Photographs. Tate Publishing. London
ISBN-13: 978-1849761284
Joshua
Cooper, T.2004.Point of No Return. Haunch of Venision.
ISBN-13: 978-0954067199
ISBN-13: 978-1899095087
Conclusions and targets for next
assignment
I’d
really like to see you continue to read around the subject matter and cite references
to theory that supports and underpin your practice. You will learn plenty from
looking at the work of others … especially the more notable figures in the
history of the discipline.
I’ll
look forward to receiving your next submission Michael - ‘Real or Fake’
Tutor
name:
|
Keith
W Roberts
|
Date
|
28/04/2014
|
Next
assignment due
|
July
2014
|
No comments:
Post a Comment